Finance News

So your startup’s runway is dwindling and fundraising is hard. What’s next?


The concept of having a runway has its own set of maxims for startup founders. Investors we’ve interviewed generally agree that a successful fundraise should leave a startup with 18 to 36 months of capital, and by the time a startup has around 9 to 12 months of cash, it should start raising its next round.

But what should startup founders do when they see the end of their runway fast approaching, investors disappearing into the woodwork, and ever fewer ways to get more capital?

Historically, the most cited and repeated piece of advice has involved cutting costs, first and foremost.

But norms are for normal times. The economy hasn’t been this volatile for years together, and founders today have to almost run the table: strategically cut costs where it’ll hurt the least, manage headcounts to keep growing, keep a close pulse on how growth is shaping up and tune burn rates accordingly, and more.

Still, adages persist for a reason, and several investors agreed that cutting costs is still the best way to get more mileage out of your startup’s bank balance if a fundraise isn’t on the horizon.

Unfortunately, a lot of startups will be dead. That’s just the nature of the fundraising environment right now. Qiao Wang, core contributor, Alliance DAO

“The minute a startup foresees some material slowdown in revenue or client decline, they should cut back costs, no matter what,” said Christian Narvaez, founder of Rayo Capital. “That would be the first step, and would help to extend your runway and give you time to fundraise. Secondly, if you’re running out of capital, think about what is happening.”

Kelly Brewster, CEO of bitcoin-focused accelerator Wolf, stressed the importance of acknowledging your circumstances, especially if they are dire. “There’s only a few levers you can pull. If you are down to just two to three months, you’re out of options. You should pay employees severance, [your remaining] tax bill, and shut down the company. Or, you may find yourself in a bad situation.”

Regardless of the outcome, if you have less than 9 months of runway, “you have to cut burn rate and let good people go, unfortunately,” said Qiao Wang, a core contributor at Alliance DAO.

The vast majority of startups’ expenses are human resources, or salaries, and reducing them is the best way to cut expenses and extend your runway, Wang told me. “Most startups just don’t need that many people. Most founders love hiring people before they have product-market fit. If they let a few people go it wouldn’t reduce their likelihood of success,” he said.

Wang’s words ring true. These past few years are testament to the fact that companies often overhire, especially when hype, FOMO and optimism drive decisions instead of a measured consideration of what the business actually needs.

The best way to consider what’s necessary to spend comes from not scaling prematurely, according to a portfolio manager who handles more than 300 web3 portfolios. “If the product isn’t fitting [its market], don’t scale your business development team just yet. And the reverse is true: if you overscale early on, it’s better to reconsider. Do you really need a 30-person team or can you deal with less? The balance is around talent,” they said, requesting anonymity.

1. “This article provided a comprehensive overview of the topic and covered all the essential points. Well done!”
2. “I appreciated the author’s use of real-life examples to support their arguments. It made the content relatable and engaging.”
3. “The writing style was clear and concise, making it easy to understand the main ideas. Great job in presenting complex information in a simple manner.”
4. “I found the inclusion of relevant data and statistics extremely useful. It added credibility to the article and strengthened the author’s arguments.”
5. “The article was well-structured, with a logical flow of information. It made it easy to follow and stay engaged throughout.”
6. “The author’s unique perspective and insights added a fresh angle to the topic. It made the article stand out from others I have read on the same subject.”
7. “I appreciated the balanced approach taken by the author, presenting different viewpoints and leaving room for readers to draw their own conclusions.”
8. “The article was thoroughly researched, with a wide range of sources cited. It showed a commitment to providing accurate and reliable information.”
9. “The inclusion of practical tips and suggestions at the end of the article was a nice touch. It provided actionable steps for readers to apply the knowledge they gained.”
10. “I found the writing to be engaging and captivating, making it hard to put the article down. It was a pleasure to read!”
Informative, concise.

Source link



Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button